rtpsw
rtpsw
Thanks for all the comments. I'll try to post some quick responses, but I'll need to get back to this later, due to other priorities.
One [CI job failure](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/3463543556/jobs/5783929365) is worth a look, but may be unrelated to the PR's changes.
@westonpace, @lidavidm - is this good to go?
> I'm still pretty reluctant to add code to handle chunked arrays. I feel it adds complexity that we will end up maintaining when chunked arrays don't really have a...
[This CI job failure](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/3508636996/jobs/5877179392) may be related to the recent commit, though I can't think of which change could have caused it. How to set up an environment to try...
> > I'm still pretty reluctant to add code to handle chunked arrays. I feel it adds complexity that we will end up maintaining when chunked arrays don't really have...
> Does the non ordered / hash aggregation handles chunk array? AFAICS, yes, There are plenty of pre-PR `GroupBy` tests in `hash_aggregate_test.cc`, such as `CountOnly` and `SumOnly`, that create a...
> [This CI job failure](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/3508636996/jobs/5877179392) may be related to the recent commit, though I can't think of which change could have caused it. How to set up an environment to...
> > [This CI job failure](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/3508636996/jobs/5877179392) may be related to the recent commit, though I can't think of which change could have caused it. How to set up an environment...
> > AFAIU, aggregating tables is a valid use case that should be supported. @westonpace, let me know your thoughts. > > Aggregation of tables should be done by using...