Kmeid
Kmeid
**Output from CCB meeting - 09.12.2020** Actions: 1. Further discussions to be conducted in the Harmonization WG and decide what should be included in milestones V3.3 and V4.0.
@HendrikAmelunxen, @thomassedlmayer would this still make it to 3.5 or is it directly handled by the Road model, i.e. 4.0?
Output of SM meeting 15.10.2021: 1. @https://github.com/m-pauly, to draft a final version based on our discussion.
@CezarySzyszkaAltran, I see you are an ASAM member. Is it possible for you to join one of our Sensor Modeling WG meetings to present your proposal? They take place on...
Adding it to dismissed due to lack of activity on this issue.
@engelben We already had discussions about this topic and drafted a proposal, it needs to be extended to converted to a .proto and extended to a pull request. I'll bring...
@ThomasSchloemicherAVL any update from your side on this topic? And do you need to discuss this in the SensorModelilng group?
@clemenshabedank, we (Ansys) have some use case on this topic. Count me in for further discussions.
@pmai, I recall that this came out of an initial bigger pull request during V3.4. Currently this is still on Draft, do we have any update on this topic?
@thempen I only see an open Issue, is there a PR? FYI: In the SM group we already had several discussions on this topic and alignments with OSC as well....