Andreas Klöckner
Andreas Klöckner
Hi Viral, I agree that a release would be great to have. In fact, there was a discussion that went all the way to Danny Sorensen on what to do...
I don't dare make this invasive a change to the ARPACK code base. That said, I do have a script by one of the FreeBSD folks that renames the routines...
In what the script implements, ARPACK retains and uses its own private, renamed copy of LAPACK 2. The improvement brought about is that you're not prevented from linking against LAPACK3...
Huh, good point. Didn't remember that--it looks like I've been using ARPACK with LAPACK3 with pretty good success then. :)
I'll see what I can do about reinstating LAPACK. BLAS hasn't changed and should be safe to leave external, correct?
Related: #19
I have nearly no experience with PARPACK, nor any way to test it. If you can provide an initial patch, I'd be happy to offer some guidance on how to...
Ugh. I can reproduce this, too. I'm not sure what's causing it. https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind_example/commit/4df3213af19f658ef5d7efc9839f4f9fe5a30749 is the last commit of nanobind-example before the switch to scikit-build-core. It doesn't seem to have this...
[Migrating to scikit-build-core](https://scikit-build-core.readthedocs.io/en/latest/migration_guide.html) might also fix this, but I think it'd be kind of a big lift.
A PR along those lines would be very welcome.