Nick McKinney
Nick McKinney
Yeah, I believe it was valid to use SpringFox with zero `Docket` beans, and in that case the existing recipes should be fine. For one `Docket` bean, do exactly what...
hey @Jenson3210 -- yep, I don't have any work in progress, so contribution from you would be excellent! The summary sounds accurate. For the `Docket` methods you mentioned, my first...
Hmm, I feel I've dug up some skeletons in this code, particularly looking at this case again: https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite-spring/blob/912d49d20171b8215c39133596c486fab2f64b10/src/test/java/org/openrewrite/java/spring/ChangeSpringPropertyKeyTest.java#L226-L231 - (...which links to #436) The `except: [ .+ ]` trick works...
hm, I see in those search results `rewrite-docs` pages describing Quarkus recipes which use that yaml variant? and clicking through there, I found this? https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus-updates/blob/2415504af33e5a79ed038bc0674b12fd6365898f/recipes/src/main/resources/quarkus-updates/core/3.3.yaml#L24
Yeah, I believe that moving the encoder bean can happen independently of the broader `WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter` change, so putting it in a separate recipe feels valid. Splitting a little further, maybe...
For `MockitoBean` support at the type level, this thread is the "live" one: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/33925 Looking at the broader list of open tasks, I think a recipe to transform type-level usage...
Hi - has this received any thought lately? I'm observing that the `nimbus-jose-jwt` dependency is still on 9.37.3, from Dec 2023; there are ~11 new minor versions (and a major...