jonpas
Framework seems way more fitting to live in a `ui` component.
Is dependency a problem?
If UI only provides framework and settings, there is zero problems with that. Custom packs are the responsibility of the packer, we have solid documentation on requirements.
@CBATeam/developers Anyone foresee any issue with this?
Post more information on what you did please. Ideally a mission that allows us to reproduce the issue on our sides.
> Could we consider making this code more resilient by optionally adding an isNil check (switch in Addons options?)? This would help in scenarios where it's crucial to avoid crashes...
If it will be fixed, then yes. Can always merge after SPE updates if it ends up not being fixed.
Has this been fixed in SPE 1.02 released on September 21st?
While I see the goals and pros of this approach, I dislike the use of try/catch/throw in SQF and the significant increase in codebase and complexity with that. @BaerMitUmlaut Would...