David Singer

On to the AB, this has policy and complex operational questions.

The W3C publishes Recommendations on web technologies, and we have long realized that we have technologies that are not expected to be, or needed to be, directly implemented in browsers...

@nigelmegitt The risk is in referencing a document that has not been tested by interoperable implementation. Giving it the wrong label exacerbates risk, rather than reducing it. If you are...

@nigelmegitt I cannot see what extra risk being honest with the label brings to external organizations. Can you clarify? Implementations have never been required to be from members, by the...

@nigelmegitt I don't want to _encourage_ it; just not delude ourselves by changing the label when our criteria are not met. I would much prefer that specs not "enter the...

I think it's suggesting that if you send a newby substitute, don't give them your proxy, but instead have an old hand proxy your vote. When was the last time...

who's on member-charter-review? would that loop in any AC member who failed to vote on the first but would object to the change? (but maybe this is a good reason...

mindless thought of the morning: maybe the tooling can be improved that the response to a comment could be seen in the same table as the responses to the ballot,...

I kinda like the idea that the set of people who get to hear of resolution is the set of people who bothered to vote (at all, including abstain) in...

Somehow we have to find a way to achieve a charter which gets consensus, addresses the review comments for which there is consensus that they should be addressed, and does...