David Singer

We seem to be using CGs more and more as part of 'normal operations', and maybe that means we either strengthen and harmonize CGs to be suitable for that as...

Note that this was discussed (as phrased) and rejected earlier: the W3C process governs member activities and is linked to the member agreement. CGs and BGs are open to non-members,...

The AB has realized that, in a sense, we have tried out (incubated) the idea of incubation, and to do that, we used an existing structure (CGs) rather than inventing...

I think we have a visibility problem for groups doing Exploration; and we have a problem that it's hard to tell which CGs are consensus-associated with the W3C's operation, and...

I think the direct proposal should be answered "no", because CGs are open to anyone. However, maybe we should define how CGs that are used *by the W3C Community* are...

I don't think the Process CG owns the CG/BG process, does it? Maybe it should...

we probably _should_ look at CGs and BGs that _are_ "part of w3C operations" (notably incubation related) and establish some norms for them. But we'd need to know what specifically...

1) Make a section "W3C Council" after the AB and TAG are defined, and move this sentence in there. Together with the [=CEO=} and the members of the TAG, members...

I agree with Michael; if the CEO is behaving inappropriately, I think appeal to the Board would be in order.

There seem to be some serious non-sequiturs here; for example, this [comment](https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/469#issuecomment-747470689) has a number of sentences starting "you" which don't seem to refer to anyone making any previous comment....