Anton Haumer
Anton Haumer
@HansOlsson yes we can drop the "very". I admit the circuit is simple but not very simple.
@casella here you go: have a preview on the PR. Feel free to comment / change ... I'm not familiar with optoelectronics and chaotic circuits, but I suppose it's a...
I'll have a look for the next release -> shifted
You can test my models at [https://github.com/AHaumer/ChaoticCircuits](https://github.com/AHaumer/ChaoticCircuits)
To demonstrate what I mean by "compared between different simulators" here we have a comparison between OpenModelica v1.23.1 and Dymola 2024x of the mentioned example, both simulations with tolerance =...
I am rather sure about the parameters (maybe not 100% those from the paper but they work). R.R=1900 leads to periodic behavior, R.R=1800 to chaotic behavior. The interesting fact about...
See discussion in the language group [#3473](https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/issues/3473) about verificationExperiment annotation.
ok so far ... but shouldn't 4.1.0 be tagged (and not touched any more) with these dates, and then changing the version number in master to 4.2.0 (#4659)? Sorry now...
If @casella overrides me, the master version shall be named 4.1.0. But: I'll never accept this PR without an empty release notes table!!! If the name "4.2.0 dev" is acceptec...
#4659 will be used instead. There is agreement that the development branch is named 4.2.0. And: There is the table missing for the release notes -> closed without merging.