Anton Haumer

I would be in favor of defining _generally_ two constants "near_small" and "near_inf" with magnitudes with a safety margin to Constants.small and Constants.inf, but small or large enough that they...

@HansOlsson it's to point a human reader to the fact "that's a special value, not just an unusual choice" 1e100 I would consider as larger but maybe meaningful value. 9.999e99...

I'm strongly in favour although you are rather late looking at the Feature freeze. Makes sense and seems to be no big project. @beutlich @dietmarw what's your opinion?

> * The State Machine feature of the Modelica Language is only for clocked systems. StateGraph2 is for continuous-time systems, so these are orthogonal features. So why close this issue?...

see also #4486: set FundamentalWave..SymmetricPolyphaseWinding.ZeroInductor.i0(nominal=10) As far as I see both `Modelica.Electrical.Machines.Examples.InductionMachines.IMC_YD` and `Modelica.Magnetic.FundamentalWave.Examples.BasicMachines.InductionMachines.IMC_YD` and `Modelica.Magnetic.QuasiStatic.FundamentalWave.Examples.BasicMachines.InductionMachines.IMC_YD` (since the last compares a transient and a quasistatic machine model) have the same...

I searched for solutions and I believe it is related to the zero system (i_0_s resp. stator.zeroInductor.i0). I have to do further tests but it looks like a small resistance...

Some results: Examples that start the same machine direct-on-line in Y or D-connection run without problems. `Modelica.Magnetic.FundamentalWave.Examples.BasicMachines.InductionMachines.IMC_YD` runs without problems even with tighter tolerance. IMHO the treatment of the zero...

Thanks to my friend @johhell - he supported me with testing and found the following: Removing the zero inductor lszero cures the problem! I'll do: - some more tests -...

This ist the original layout, just adapted the parameters.

converted to draft: Has to be updated after #4653 has been merged.