Yuxuan Zhou

Thanks for the I2I If this is updating the existing component in a backward compatible way, I don't see a reason why not. >My main goal would be to add...

From my understand, we need a solution to recognize request from the same session. Right now we have the `PAGE_VIEW_ID` and the high entropy `PAGE_VIEW_ID_64` that's under active development. One...

I see. Thank you @welkie for the explaination. > Just grouping beacons into sessions on the sever won't work for this, because the client needs to be aware of the...

Thanks for the detailed explanation! cc @jeffjose. Jeff let's sync on this requirement next week. >So because JS on the site owner's domain is controlling the setting of the cookie...

Synced with @jeffjose We decide to pick up the work. Please review the I2I at #29324. Thanks

@alanorozco I wonder if `` is supported within ``? Is this more of a feature request or a bug. cc @dmanek as well since this is related to ``

@dougscher You are suggesting adding `extraUrlParamsReplaceMap` to trigger config as well as the `extraUrlParams`. What to do with global `extraUrlParamsReplaceMap` and trigger level `extraUrlParamsReplaceMap`? Shall we combine the values and...

@rudygalfi Do you maybe have some context on why we put the 16 entries limit to `extraUrlParamsReplaceMap`. from #1932

I think expanding the limit from 16 to 40 is reasonable. I also think that `extraUrlParamsReplaceMap` should only be defined by analytics vendors. Maybe a good approach is to remove...

Thank you @riklund Based on the design, all value will be calculated client side. The proposal LGTM.