Yusuke Wada
Yusuke Wada
@kbkn3 Thank you! Let's go with it. This is a new feature so that it will be included in the next new minor version, `v4.6.0`. I'll later merge this PR...
Hi @akku1139 Supporting adding extra header names is good. But I don't agree with using the generics for `Hono`. The generics for `Hono` have two types, `Bindings` and `Variables`. These...
Regarding adding custom header types, I think it's not good to pass generics to `new Hono` because of [the above reason](https://github.com/honojs/hono/pull/3289#issuecomment-2295208742). Instead of it, we can extend the types with...
@yasuaki640 Thank you!! Let's go with it.
Hey @m-shaka @NamesMT Can you share your opinion on this PR and review it?
@m-shaka @NamesMT Thank you! As you said, we should support the default response type. I like @NamesMT 's implementation. My proposal is to pass the default type generics into `client.foo.$ge()`...
@m-shaka Thank you for your comment! @NamesMT What do you think of this API? https://github.com/honojs/hono/pull/3292#issuecomment-2295778823
Hi @NamesMT It looks good! We should consider the naming if we go with `$withDR` or get other names, but I like the idea (I think `withDR` is not bad).
@NamesMT Okay! Enjoy your time!
Hi @Scythemen Can you share a minimal project to reproduce it?