Vladyslav Mustafin

Greetings library maintainers, We've started work on SDL-0234. To prepare the technical specification, here are some questions for you: 1. The Python defined as a strict requirement in the proposal...

2 . Thank you for the clarification, we already caught this logic before your answer, but till we read the source code of the RPCResponse class, it was not clear...

@joeygrover thank you for answers, only point 4 is not fully clear, did you mean the scope of the generator proposal or library itself? Should or should not unit tests...

@joeygrover we have found the usage of the new method `setValue` for `RPCStruct` children, which does not exist in the parent class nor the classes where that method is used....

@joeygrover thank you for the quick reply, the summarizing based on this: 1,2,3 - We will continue to follow the existing code in the `develop` branch. We have provided the...

@crokita @nickschwab based on [this comment](https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_core/pull/3213#discussion_r375483807) the branch of `lib/rpc_spec` submodule should point to `develop` branch instead of `master`. I'm not sure about the correct workflow for this change here....

@joeygrover Are there required additional issues to be created here before creating PRs? Could I do it by myself?

@theresalech @joeygrover @TinaKleczka @mrapitis because it impacts all related platforms, should it be included as revision in the [SDL-0234](https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0234-proxy-rpc-generation.md) proposal and considered on SDLC? The generator changes were requested in:...