Viacheslav Borovitskiy
Viacheslav Borovitskiy
> Thanks @vabor112. This is definitely a very good suggestion. Would you be willing to do this change? If not, I'll take it whenever I find some time. Cannot promise...
I filed an [issue](https://github.com/wilson-labs/cola/issues/103) with `cola` developers.
Repeating > I do not believe this issue is stale. Could this label please be removed?
Thanks, Thomas!
I suggest adding citation in CFF format. Then the "cite this repository" button will behave nicer: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-citation-files Important: don't forget `type: article` in CFF, otherwise bibtex entry will be `software`...
> so CFF is a less-optimal format in our situation I disagree. Take a look at [this repo](https://github.com/igraph/rigraph), for example. If you click "Cite this repository', there's both a quick...
I can't believe this is so difficult 🫤. > On that page, it requires more clicks for the user to get the bib entry No, there you click "cite this...
This will have to wait. As of now, [geomstats](https://github.com/geomstats/geomstats) doesn't support Python 3.12. Judging by [this](https://github.com/geomstats/geomstats/issues/1951), it's already in their main, but it hasn't been in any release yet. On...