teseoch
teseoch
I checked some random and they are here: https://github.com/libigl/libigl-tutorial-data Which one is missing?
This requires changing the cmake in a non-trivial way. We think that most users will not compile the bindings from source, but getting the pre-compiled binaries from conda-forge.
try setting `load_headers = True` to False
ok... I think that script was built for internal usage :)
i think we should fix the script, it is super useful :) In particular add the ability to skip existing bindings
the script uses clang to generate the code. https://github.com/libigl/libigl-python-bindings/blob/master/scripts/parser.py The reason of the `headers.dat` is that it requires time to compile each file and get the ast, while generating the...
The doc comes directly from the comments in the C++ version to make changes in git, fork the repo (there is a button), create a branch make your change and...
Strange, this is something inside numpyeigen. Also strange the it builds on the CI (maybe something on pybind11 changed in the last 3 days?) @fwilliams can we update to the...
we don't, we decided to wrap these special "function" with classes. Here are all the one we have: https://github.com/libigl/libigl-python-bindings/blob/77028b9ebd5737a618af6331cc31c3f04c317a56/classes/classes.cpp#L14
@roaasoloh is this sill an issue (i.e., can you try to get the latest version of the bindings)? if so, can you provide us with the input?