Simon Schmeisser
Simon Schmeisser
Hi, please see our version of `kuka_experimental` for a support package: https://github.com/isys-vision/kuka_experimental We were told by Kuka that KRC 5 is fully compatible to KRC4 software wise (its KSS 8.7...
> Edit: o wait, you already have #210 open. > > Is that PR in a reviewable state? You always tend to find something :wink: but after a quick glance...
See https://github.com/simonschmeisser/kuka_experimental/commits/hydro-devel I actually forgot that I never opened a PR for that ... please ping me if that hasn't happened in another month or so
please try #167 and tell me if any issues arise in the PR
Just a small update: this package has been used and tested extensible now. The ikfast plugin was created on kinetic and seems to create problems here on indigo (C++98vsC++11?)
@gavanderhoorn @BrettHemes I would be really grateful for some feedback on naming. We have a current request from a client for the new Kuka Ionic KR70 R2100 and same as...
This now follows the naming standards of having the variant last. I think the `cybertech` should not be omitted as there is also a `KR 16 R1610-2` (PR upcoming ...)
What's the status on this PR?
Oh and do you know if there is a difference between KR10 R900-2 and KR10 R900 sixx? Besides color? I'm getting crazy with the Kuka naming schemes! --- To answer...
just came across one "small" issue ... https://github.com/Jmeyer1292/opw_kinematics/issues/11