Scott Deaton
Scott Deaton
Proposal - each USCS Symbol should have its own symbol, each AASHTO should have its own symbol (based on the symbology from USCS - this would be done in software...
Others could be entered but we definitely need a list of these so we can easily exchange that data. Similarly, I think we need a list of defined laboratory test...
Can we fix this in 2.5 also, so we don't get invalid DIGGS files when including this property?
I agree that for MWD data, we really need a more compact format - like the CPT data to properly encode this from automated data acquisition otherwise the file will...
We need lbf/sec and N/sec, kN/sec.
I agree - it definitely would have the benefit being able to be opened automatically/recognized as a DIGGS file without having to open it and is fundamentally a good suggestion.
I agree with Peter - I would just go with .diggs.
I believe our Authority needs to be more specific. USCS could be field classification vs lab classification. They are fundamentally similar but different systems. They have all of the same...
Yes - I believe it is confusing and potentially misleading. It causes problems for users, software developers, etc. If all 50 state DOTs decide to disregard the standards then there...
If anyone wants specific subsets of data from these files, please reply to this post and I can eliminate all portions of the data except the relevant subsets requested.