Saurabh Kamat
Saurabh Kamat
@azeey Could I work on this?
> Yes, please go ahead. I'll assign it to you. Would like to know your opinion on a possible implementation idea here: - Have a single mutex to protect both...
> @sauk2 are you interested in implementing this yourself? @azeey Yes, I can work on this implementation.
Building on @j-rivero’s points, users who want to build `gz-sim` without GUI support can simply add `-DENABLE_GUI=OFF` to their CMake command.
> Did you already considered how to handle this? @traversaro Thanks for bringing this up! There are two approaches to handling the non-Python dependencies. As a starting point, we could...
> This make sense, but personally I would avoid to upload such wheels to PyPI, as they would be broken for most users without the pip solver being aware of...
What do you think about using [`setup-ros`](https://github.com/ros-tooling/setup-ros) instead of the current approach followed for ROS 1?
> this is in progress. as of [d823820](https://github.com/gazebosim/sdformat/commit/d8238203c21dc36ea6f68c3c158d9325b2e39d24), the `src/gz.cc` and `src/gz.hh` files are duplicated into the `src/cmd` folder and a standalone executable is built and installed into `libexec` but...
> @scpeters I've merged #1489 into this PR. I've a few more comments, but I think this is almost there. @azeey I have raised a separate PR with the requested...
> Let's try to fix the X / Qt issue Thanks for catching this! I have made changes in CMake to not link the `gz` library to `gz-sim-server`. I think...