Raphael
Raphael
@Pandapip1 isn't it possible to keep the original EIP number? 🙏 It's not taken, would be simpler in terms of historical continuity, not to mention all the renaming in: -...
@Pandapip1 Why not? The following comment suggests that this number can be kept with the approval of @nicola, the original author of the issue, which I have: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/4966#discussion_r846704349
Thank you @SamWilsn. I added Nicola's github username and fixed the EIP validation errors.
@SamWilsn Thank you for your feedback! And sorry for the delay in addressing it. It's ready for re-review.
Do you mean from a security perspective? I see that they're the same because the roles are swapped so the active and passive addresses are the same in both tests....