mgarnier59
mgarnier59
> @mgarnier59 @thierry-martinez how do the performance of simulation compare with original implementation? I presume no significant difference since it's only modifying the initialization part? We didn't investigate it. What's...
Also, we have starting using the `hypothesis`package that is good at generating strategies and finding pathological cases. Sometimes it's a bit too much (like testing for NaN parameter values) but...
I will work on that. I think it also requires modification of the preparation MBQC command N so as to allow user-defined preparations.
That's something we have in mind and will do soon. The easiest way seems to check we don't offend runnability when adding a command without reference to the graph and...
Hi Masato, that will be one of the topics of our discussion in July with @shinich1 and @thierry-martinez. We want to have a better grasp of this backend (why it...
Thanks a lot! Yes indeed too bad you can't be there but we might schedule a call at some point. Or later to let you know what happened. > why...
Thanks! Indeed I think we need to think and discuss more on what to do with this backend. For input states we could try different TN architecture. Also, there are...
Have a look at https://github.com/TeamGraphix/graphix/pull/178. It is done there.
Indeed that's something we were considering when looking at upgrading the Pauli measurement preprocessing. Are we sure, the modulo can miss some cases? I had the same question but it...
Since this is linked to the transpiler, maybe discuss on https://github.com/TeamGraphix/graphix/issues/142 ?