Greg Orlov
Greg Orlov
@tiagopog, I would love some feedback on this.
@tiagopog bump?
@tiagopog have you had a chance to look at this at all?
Thanks for taking the time! can you please update the changelog?
Would you be open to opening up a PR with an idea of how that would work?
@senid231 what do you think about a `call`able type? Have you seen people use the types much?
@senid231 I guess my question is more: does this belong in the client gem or is this a higher level concern? This feels like parser logic rather than a cast/field...
This looks reasonable. Can you take a look at the failing test and see if it's related to the change? Thanks!
Is this still an issue, @delner? Would you be willing to work with us to PR it into the gem?
Oh. That's not great. I'll take a look. Thanks for bringing this up!