ejn
ejn
OK, you're right that `LAYERS` is not just noise, but we're obviously in agreement that only those layers in `QUERY_LAYERS` should be considered as being requested in the context of...
@tfr42 Done. See e-mail and #1125.
> Thanks for this contribution! Instead of adding a new `featureType` member on `ol/Feature`, which is quite specific to GML, I'd suggest giving the GML format a `featureTypeProperty` option, and...
Thanks for the feedback @ahocevar - will make the changes as you suggest. Agree that the change event is unnecessary - had thought about it in case the rendering should...
@ahocevar Hope it was OK to force-push the branch. Didn't seem necessary to leave noise in the history.
> Didn't you want to also have the GML writer pick up the `featureType`? Ultimately yes. Since the writing is slightly more complicated - and my immediate requirement is fulfilled...
@ahocevar Sure, I'll try and cut it down to a reasonable size as it's part of a viewer application. Note that #12936 also resulted from parsing such data! Although the...
@ahocevar Thanks for your patience on this up until now - will try and and some more tests etc. It looks like I won't have time to work on this...
This appears to still be a problem - trying to update boostrap to 5.3.3 doesn't work. @cpsievert appears to have a fix, but doesn't seem to have been merged/released?
I guess the solution is to use [msOWSGetSchemasLocation()](https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/blob/48b19a2752adbe74e7020fdddf78488ca7701bb3/src/mapows.h#L203) in [processApiRequest()](https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/blob/48b19a2752adbe74e7020fdddf78488ca7701bb3/src/mapogcapi.cpp#L1615C12-L1615C29).