Meinte Boersma

Results 54 comments of Meinte Boersma

Officially UVCI → UCI: would this spec. need to reflect that? It's already implied by the `"(Vaccine)"` in the title.

@benlaurie As with the other issue you raised: thanks for being so precise, and sorry about the short answer. Taking the files from the latest release (1.3.1), then the `nam`...

> So instead the bug is "person_name/description is incorrect". Ah, I now see your point! What would you like as a better description? (For starting an iteration.) > Also, if...

> Well, it should probably say its a structure defining a person's name. Also, since some of the fields refer to a "standardised name" it would be helpful to know...

@benlaurie @Xiphoseer @ryanbnl What do you think of the following for `person_name`'s `description`?: > The person's name consisting at least of a separate standardised surname, or a standardised forename, or...

Agree that a Git `pre-commit` hook is the best solution here.

Hi @chauhan-rohit, The following document presents a lot more details about the verification of a DCC (“DGC” is the old acronym): https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/ehealth/docs/eu-dcc_validation-rules_en.pdf The context of that document is that of...

Sorry for opening this up, but I like this suggestion. Also: what's the precise difference between the "Awesome MPS" and "Build with MPS" (which should be 'built') categories?

I think we should close this: I think the current interest in the EU DCC has waned so much that getting this (frankly: quite detailed) thing exactly right is not...