Adrian Cole

sorry ignore the question about reduced memory usage as the bench already has bytes, allocs in it.

@sammcj do you mind updating this for deepseek-v2? I switched the FROM and this ended up returning quoted json instead of what models like mistral response from v1/chat/completions using this...

_From @cburroughs on December 20, 2016 18:36_ I'm unsure how to reproduce this. I tried synthesizing a trace with the root span: ``` { "traceId": "1b0c8b7d5a4a4632a8462d044d2fffff", "id": "81d0a94237ae54de", "name": "foo",...

in zipkin v1 we have to have at least one annotation or binary annotation as that's where the servicename is sourced from. If you could help with model v2 support...

ps (does this literally crash or just doesn't show up?)

_From @bkleef on May 3, 2017 14:4_ @adriancole this is still the case with version 1.23.3. As you can see we only set `binaryAnnotations` possibly because we use https://github.com/openzipkin/zipkin-go-opentracing. On...

_From @basvanbeek on May 3, 2017 14:29_ `zipkin-go-opentracing` does not force you to do binary annotations only. If you want to annotate a span as a RPC client node calling...

_From @bkleef on May 3, 2017 16:19_ @basvanbeek thanks a lot for your feedback. We will look into it. IMHO it's still a bad thing that the _new_ Zipkin UI...

I was going to ask. Seems this issue wss opened on the wrong repository as the new UI code is not here. Moreover, we are looking to renovate the "old...

So there's logic in zipkin.ts which assumes there's at least one annotation: ex. ``` this.name = this.root.annotations[1].endpoint.serviceName; ... uniqueId += span.name + span.annotations[0].endpoint.serviceName; ... span.children.sort((a, b) => a.annotations[0].timestamp - b.annotations[0].timestamp);...