Alex Lian

Thanks for noting this. We've had some internal discussion regarding open sourcing tpx, however that's not in the cards for anytime soon. We'll aim to clean up the tpx reference...

> However, in Buck2, the actions.download_file is more restrictive than Bazel's: it only allows you to download with a checksum. Since I could still accomplish the same thing if I...

> That's too bad, cached test results are a pretty killer feature. This was a pretty contentious discussion internally between a number of teams. Ultimately, given Remote Execution's ability to...

> I'm curious what are the arguments against caching test results? Is it just because it can be done on RE side or there is something more fundamental? IIRC, test...

Yup, so internally with our test runner we can route tests to Remote Execution. I suspect our planned work (though empty on details) in [Test Info v2](https://github.com/facebook/buck2/blob/main/docs/rfcs/drafts/test-info-v2.md) would better support...

Superceded by 946, so will close this one.

Apologies this lingered so long. Could I ask for a rebase, and given prior discussion here I'll aim to see this through (unless internally someone ended up forming an opinion)

@vaskomitanov Apologies, we've let this lag a little too long and this needs a rebase / resolution of conflicts. If you can get that done, we can aim to see...

Closing this for now in lieu of just getting the other example and buck2 building up first.

This was also discussed in discord, and interestly recently internally. In our monorepo, stacked commit process, and RBE, this is not not our common case so it's certainly not something...