Tony Alberti
Tony Alberti
Additionally, `rotatePins` is fixed to increments of 60 degree rotations, while `rotate` is expected to be a flexible rotation. However, once `assembly.rotate` boils down to `blocks.rotate`, that flexible rotation angle...
Oh yeah. This hasn't been touched for a long time and just spits a DepracationWarning. I say time to remove the warning and just yank it!
@john-science any thoughts on renaming the snapshotInterface too? > and if possible renaming the snapshotInterface to something more accurate with its current intended usage. Something like dumpInputInterface or something like...
> @albeanth - what's the progress on this and other axial expansion improvements? - this specifically? Nothing. But it should be as simple as deleting those two lines and maybe...
The mass conservation tables look like the following: ### massConservationReport Is assembly-wide and shows the pre- and post-axial expansion mass values for the unique materials and components. ``` [xtra] pre-exp...
> Is the fix related to the change of c.height = growFrac * blockHeight to c.height = growFrac * prevCompHeight? @keckler, yes, exactly.
> The mass conservation tables look like the following: > > ### massConservationReport > Is assembly-wide and shows the pre- and post-axial expansion mass values for the unique materials and...
> > Is the fix related to the change of c.height = growFrac * blockHeight to c.height = growFrac * prevCompHeight? > > @keckler, yes, exactly. This is breaking downstream...
That its almost had its first birthday! 😄 Feel free to close. I can dig it up when the time comes. On Fri, Jun 7, 2024, 3:55 PM John Stilley...