Abhishek K

> Hi @afeiszli! Do y'all have any updates on this? In Discord you mentioned this would ideally be coming Q1 2023: https://discord.com/channels/825071750290210916/825071821594034196/1060000352407146517 > > I'm in no rush but wanted...

@miyu4u, the endpoint of the host will be made editable should be available in v0.20.6, but you can run `netclient pull` on your client for it to get updated

Have you set node A and node B as static hosts? usually clients reach each other over local endpoints that are detected if possible, this happens automatically unless the host...

> @abhishek9686 If the two nodes are behind a single nat, they are able to ping each other If the two nodes are behind a double nat, they are not...

> Yes on the same local network that is double natted It should be simple for you to replicate if there are on local network, endpoint detection on netclient will...

> just seen the same, honestly netmaker is nearly unusable, mac .pkg does not work, brew install does not work either, why you make statements that netmaker is better than...

> The .pkg Claim "Not Compatible with OS" but brew would be totally fine. just fetch the right image which OS are you on? why won't the installer be compatible...

> I think I have solved the issue... It's the UDP hole punching causing issues, if I switch it off everything works as expected. I don't understand how this affects...

we no longer support netclient on FreeBSD, instead, you can generate wireguard VPN configuration for your netmaker network and connect your FreeBSD machine to the VPN. https://docs.netmaker.io/external-clients.html

> +1 here. Leaving an active ping between two nodes looses connection after a min or two. > > My workaround: > > ``` > sudo crontab -e > ......