Vinicius Guimaraes

> I think it's a great idea to allows estimating energy consumption in OTNS. Thanks for the PR. @Vinggui > > BTW, are we expecting a related PR at OTNS...

Ok, so now it looks like we have a chicken and the egg situation: Tests seems to be failing because OTNS is doing many warnings, but this is expected since...

> > Ok, so now it looks like we have a chicken and the egg situation: Tests seems to be failing because OTNS is doing many warnings, but this is...

I already made some changes to the radio, making the timing between transmissions more realistic. As I understood, the actual code in the repo does not have any timing, therefore,...

> @Vinggui , any plan to move this PR forward? Hello @jwhui Thanks for checking up to this PR. At the moment, this PR is waiting for updates on the...

> What's the relationship of this PR to #7897 ? Hi @simonlingoogle , The PR #7897 has no direct relation to this PR, nor did I work with its developer....

> Does https://github.com/openthread/ot-ns/pull/235 depend on radio state only? If so, we may have a separate PR for radio state emitting. No, https://github.com/openthread/ot-ns/pull/235 does not depend on radio state only. When...

> Sorry for coming in late with my comments, I'm just seeing this now ... I think this PR is addressing very similar issues as the #7897 and OT-NS ([openthread/ot-ns#316](https://github.com/openthread/ot-ns/pull/316))...

> What seems a possible approach: > > 1. Combine the "accurate timing" and CCA improvements of this PR and the other PR [Support for simulator with external RF/timing models ...

> Just to be clear, noting that this PR is built on top of https://github.com/openthread/openthread/pull/8144 - so it would need to be merged after that one. Yes, that is correct....