Vinicius Guimaraes

Hi @EskoDijk , I would like to thank you to keep contributing and commenting on these PRs. Definitely some good points were mentioned already. > Just noting for completeness that...

> The "Ideal*" radiomodels I propose do handle all the channels - it's only that they do not simulate collissions. To me that seems a valid model: it tries to...

> The `Develop` workflow tests are failing. Is this expected? @jwhui I had a similar problem recently exactly on the same place. I thought that this could be the problem,...

Hi @bukepo , I saw the you last edited the ```GetRssi(uint16_t aChannel)``` function. With this PR that provides a CCA communication with OTNS, do you think we can link this...

> @Vinggui This looks good, very useful that the new code works with the existing OT node. (I just updated my own radiomodel PR in such a way that existing...

> For example while the radio is doing the mandatory wait periods or during "turn around time" it may have different power consumption from regular Rx/Tx states? Do you mean...

Maybe here, we should fix the [Issue 272](https://github.com/openthread/ot-ns/issues/272). It seems like the best PR to do it.

> Medium is busy for all nodes when 1 node sends Does it mean that the entire medium for all nodes is considered busy whenever one single node started transmitting?...

> > > Medium is busy for all nodes when 1 node sends > > > > > > Does it mean that the entire medium for all nodes is...

> For the present PR, CHANNEL_ACTIVITY would not be strictly needed to do CCA prior to a frame transmit because the CCA is already done by OT-NS as part of...