Björn Kautler

Yes, of course not, they are from the same lib as the interface. In this case it is JDA.

I'm not sure we have an active Grails-capable person here. And Peter who at least had a plan is not on the project anymore. I guess a Grails-savvy user needs...

The concept is not new, but for the other dependencies there is a clear and obvious error message. If the testkit is missing it is more a subtle crypted error...

Could maybe the interaction block be extended for doing it explicitly on a case by case basis? Something like ```groovy interaction(priority: 5) { 1 * subscriber.receive(message) } ``` or ```groovy...

re. 1.: Not sure yet what I like most or feels best Other options or detail could be to have the `where` method in the sub-spec, that injects data to...

I'd say this is probably the same or at least related as complained about in #1008. Skipped features or specs are with 2.x also not reported as skipped tests through...

This cannot be solved on either side unless Powermock would add explicit Groovy support which is probably very unlikely. Powermock uses custom classloaders for non-system classes and if you `@PrepareForTest`...

I agree. Well, as the issue (at least for final stuff) is opened by one of the spock maintainers and also labeled `help-wanted`, I'd say it is safe to assume...

> I don't think that you are one of the Spock maintainers (feel free to correct me if I am wrong) Correct. :-) > If every time I got 1...

Spock is realized by a custom JUnit runner on the base class `Specification`. So I guess you can simply do it the normal JUnit way. Have one class annotated with...