Björn Kautler

Can you maybe provide a minimal reproducer project? And do you have the same problem when you use ByteBuddy instead of cglib?

Now I'm a bit confused. You say in your next to last comment you expect a `Mock` to return `null`. But in your last comment you show that you use...

You got me slightly wrong and should reopen the issue. Yes, `Stub` should return a dummy object there, namely another stub. But it should work properly and not result in...

I guess the code thinks this is `Object` return type, not seing the bound on the type parameter and thus producing a wrong stub as return value.

You are twisting my words a bit here. All I said was, that the users guide also links to the example project which shows how to run Spock 2.x tests...

Don't worry, I don't take it personally. I just don't like being quoted wrongly. Especially if that would mean I said non-sense. I did never said it is "well explained",...

For a `GroovyMock` I would understand that `null` is returned as it works by default with `ZeroOrNullResponse`. For a `GroovyStub` which uses `EmptyOrDummyResponse` by default I would have expected a...

I don't really agree. I'm mostly user too and as user I expect from a `Mock`, that all mockable callables return `null` as documented. @leonard84 & @szpak what are your...

Maybe you slightly misinterpret what a global mock is. The `Mock` call itself indeed returns a mock object, but not the one the SUT receives on constructor call. As documented...

Do we really needed to follow this non-sense movement of exaggerated anti-racism? Imho we should stick to what Git uses as default which still is `master`.