S.P.

Here https://pypi.org/project/crypto-commons/ we put MIT, so I guess we'll stick with that. But isn't it enough that it's available in pip? Also you understand that this is by no means...

1. Have you read https://github.com/ctftime/ctftime.org/issues/40 and also https://github.com/ctftime/ctftime.org/issues/61 ? Please do. 2. I generally agree and I was advocating similar measures before, however just to play devil's advocate: there are...

I honestly don't see why. If a team can organize a decent CTF then it deserves to get points for that. In fact, from experience, I know that preparing good...

> Earning nearly all their points only from organizing just 1 CTF is what I'm talking about. I don't get the problem. Some teams get nearly all their points from...

> They earned most of their points(75.3 points to be exact) from running Backdoor CTF(which, based on the comments on CTFTime, had some problems) 1. Rating is now calculated for...

> Have a small committee that ranks the CTFs up-front, and provides a promotion/demotion information for the year after. The issue here is basically `How to grade a new CTF...

@dasm it won't work simply because statistics is applicable only if enough teams vote, and they vote reasonably. The tendency is different. Many CTFs don't get almost any votes, especially...

> does not need to be a committee of top-teams As I pointed out above, the issue is with relative scoring between CTFs. If you can't solve majority of tasks...

I agree. Additionally this should also apply if the "max weight" was modified for some reason - the voting time should be extended from this point. Otherwise we might get...

@kyprizel can't you just enable voting only after the scorboard gets posted? As for HITCON, my point was just that initially, after the event ended, you could vote for max...