Voting for events should be bound to global ranking

Open gcm-explo1t opened this issue 5 years ago • 1 comments

I think the top 50 Teams are well known and recognized. In my opinion, their evaluation of a CTF is the most valuable one, as these teams can pretty good decide if a CTF was of high quality or not. In order to increase the value of a well organized CTF i suggest, that these teams get the full rating spectrum from 0 - 100 Points without the initial point boundaries.

Benefits:

Faster identification of good CTFs
More points for teams organizing high quality events and creating demanding tasks
Faster rating decrease of deteriorating CTFs

What do you think about this adaption?

Oct 06 '20 10:10 gcm-explo1t

Have you read https://github.com/ctftime/ctftime.org/issues/40 and also https://github.com/ctftime/ctftime.org/issues/61 ? Please do.
I generally agree and I was advocating similar measures before, however just to play devil's advocate: there are lots of new/entry-level CTFs where top teams don't play. What about those? :)

Nov 04 '20 12:11 Pharisaeus