Paul Jonas Jost
Paul Jonas Jost
> @PaulJonasJost this should be related to #778 @yannikschaelte, @LeonardSchmiester could this perhaps have been fixed by #803?
we could write something like decorators above usages of certain samplers? If that sounds about right then I would do it.
As far as I know and tested, with the hdf5 history that should automatically happen, the only thing I would not be sure there is whether the interrupted run is...
it does not create the directory? that is weird as I should do that automatically... (in pypesto.optimize.util line 36-41)
> > I don't understand the issue or question. Improved memory handling is already implemented in AMICI and pypesto should make use of that. I don't see any issues adding...
I am also not sure what exactly we are now discussing anymore. Would like to ask whether I should then delete the branch or whether (and in which direction) I...
So we would want a function that creates starting points. Either it gets passed an optimization_result or a prior. In case of the optimization result it should automatically determine "good"...
mhh normally just running it again solves the problem... I think that also sometimes happens with other hdf5 tests. Not exactly sure why this happens tbh
can this be closed @yannikschaelte?
@yannikschaelte flake8 seems to have an update, should I fix the new errors?