Maté Strysewske
Maté Strysewske
Have the samples been created by the user you're using? Are they in the same jurisdiction as the user jurisdiction, if the user has a jurisdiction at all (I guess...
@zohaibhassan122 Can you please check whether this error persists in the current development version, i.e. 1.76.0? Preferably on a server with no custom user roles created, because there's a known...
@roxanamlendea I believe it's actually the other way around. If I'm not mistaken, we've removed the requirement from that field on purpose, and the inconsistency would then actually be that...
Okay, then I'd just decide that we should change the creation form and make the field optional there.
@SahaLinaPrueger Please add the user role of the user you produced this message with to the issue description, or if it's a custom user role, please add a screenshot of...
#10362 documents a very similar error. This behaviour can probably be observed for multiple directories and might be connected to the missing user right to view existing persons.
#10409 very likely describes the root of this problem.
Not a bug in my eyes because it's not a malfunction of the software, but an additional convenience function for the user.
Since the list of user rights requiring a certain other user right can be very large, the format suggested in the issue description is not universally practical. Additional requirements as...
This is probably what causes #10361. Added a reference to this issue there, we can probably close this one as soon as #10361 has been tackled.