Arthur Bretas
Arthur Bretas
@mews6 u still working on this issue?
I think that u r in the perfect way to solve it! It's my first time here to, and if u wan't to discuss about it, I will be glad...
This is a fantastic proposal, and a huge win for the developer experience in Anchor. I was initially cautious about the introduction of `unsafe` to handle the lifetime changes, but...
Just some considerations: The core safety of this change hinges on the Context and its references not "escaping" the scope of the instruction handler. The primary edge case I can...
Question, any existing code using `#[account(rent_exempt = skip)]` or `#[account(rent_exempt = enforce)]` will fail to compile? Since you removed those features... @jamie-osec
Done, removed the unnecessary check and also tested with `unsafe { LLVMDisposeMemoryBuffer(buffer) };` and the tests panic. cc @tamird
hey @tamird gm! any blockers here ?