Maciej Bielecki

> Sorry for the naive question - but is the test case above from this API, I don't see those functions listed? @dakom This test is not included in the...

> A new top-level function like `showSql` except that it replaces literals? Exactly that. [Here](https://github.com/tomjaguarpaw/haskell-opaleye/compare/master...zyla:feature/anonymize-queries) is my work in progress. I've created a `showSqlAnonymized` function, which is like `showSql` except...

Thanks for the response. I don't think `postgresql-simple` is the best place to add this. That said, I'm not entirely convinced `opaleye` is either. In case anyone is interested, here's...

> Perhaps a nice idea would be to have data Manipulation a = ... which represents any INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE that returns columns of type a. Sounds reasonable. Are you thinking of...

Another idea: Why not integrate `Query` into this? ```haskell data Operation a = ... showSql :: Operation a -> String run :: PGS.Connection -> Operation a -> IO a query...

Good idea. However, I think users could be unhappy if we dropped Java compatibility. What about overloading `null` so that it behaves like `Prelude.null` at function types, and like `Data.NullPointer.null`...

By the way, thanks for making this awesome library! It's a very useful piece of the PureScript ecosystem, because `purescript-quickcheck` doesn't have shrinking.