Yuriy

@adityapk00 when an issue with t-addresses will be fixed?

Automatical sending fonds by smart contract, based on voting, is not a good idea. Due to a lack of a control mechanism, a scammer could make a good proposal (listing...

I did not see any problem in that example. Alice get little more reward, because her part in first 40 blocks not 0.6666, but little bit more (she was only...

I've added [protection against significant manipulation of block.timestamp](https://github.com/yuriy77k/Cold-staking/blob/d8a8eddfa024770c63d37f344ee2dd775a59dbc2/ColdStaking.sol#L118-L125)

@RideSolo 1. The reward is calculated and paid not for block, but for a month 2. This situation looks terrible if you look at it as presented (in blocks). But...

> My point was to show that the reward is dependent on users actions. My examples also show that **final** staker reward dependent on users actions even with RideSolo's formula....

What do you think about calculation staker reward at fixed day / time? For example each 15 day of month. In this case every staker will receive rewards commensurate with...

> the reward dependence comes from the non-fixed round_invetrval start of each user, as pointed out before the only way to avoid the reward dependence is to use the smalest...

> I think that the version that we are going to pick now may be replaced with a better one in future as well. Replace Cold Staking contract is not...

> Monthly network congestion, since all stakers will be claiming their rewards at the same period. we can fix RewardPool on selected day, and staker can claim his reward on...