Yukihiro Hasegawa

I have addressed this in pull request #3732 and will proceed to close this one. I'll handle the areas requiring type changes separately.

> are you talking about how the plugin code is authored? Yes, I am referring to how the plugin code is authored. The former doesn't seem to provide type checking,...

I have rebased and cleaned up the commits. Please check.

@Sidnioulz Thanks for the heads-up. I’ve revised the testing steps and clarified how to keep tab indentation in package.json. Could you re-test with the updated instructions?

~~I could not reproduce this issue. When I run the following code, the autofix does not add async/await to the forEach callback:~~ ```ts const foo = []; foo.forEach(() => {...

> Which documentation is missing? I would like to generate content like the following in the rule documentation: `💼⚠️ This rule is enabled in the ✅ recommended config.` or `This...

Thank you for investigating and providing the background.😄 I understand the situation better now. How about adding an option or some functionality to allow document generation even for naming patterns...

I see, that makes perfect sense. If I understand correctly, this would mean supporting multiple prefixes. Specifically, would it also require generating rule documentation titles that include multiple prefixes? For...

I'm curious about what kind of rule documentation titles would be generated if `legacy-recommended` or` legacy-all `were not included in `ignoreConfigs`. While the possibility might be low, I believe it's...

I didn't have any specific metrics; I just happened to notice this pattern being used more often recently, which made me curious—so I created the issue somewhat casually. 😄 That...