wwebers

Interesting! Does your setup differ to the one described here? Any special injections and/or DSDT/SSDT edits?

Well, my box is the original V5-573G with the Geforce 750m. It work fine with just one external screen connected, either HDMI or HDMI via adapter to "Acer Converter port"....

Hi, I have the AzureWave CE123H with BT + BCM4352. Works fine for me but unfortunately not out of the box. What I did is to add the following to...

Well, direct support for the original Valetudo firmware would be great. Simply as Valetudo RE doesn't seem to get actively mainained.

@PiotrMachowski I'll look into it. For some reason the communication with the "camera" topic doesn't work, which works perfectly fine with the orginal Valetudo card.

@PiotrMachowski Sorry for late response. I updated HA today and my issue is that it complains about the "camera" source. I already installed "Lovelace Valetudo Map Card" via HACS. Still,...

@PiotrMachowski Ah! That explains things! My mistake. Thank you. I mean those MQTT publish commands used by the "Valetudo RE" template: [https://github.com/PiotrMachowski/lovelace-xiaomi-vacuum-map-card/blob/master/src/model/generators/platform_templates/rand256_valetudo_re.json](https://github.com/PiotrMachowski/lovelace-xiaomi-vacuum-map-card/blob/master/src/model/generators/platform_templates/rand256_valetudo_re.json)

Am looking directly into the source code of "Valetudo": [https://github.com/Hypfer/Valetudo/tree/master/backend/lib/mqtt](https://github.com/Hypfer/Valetudo/tree/master/backend/lib/mqtt) Doesn't look like the original "Valetudo" has support for the "custom_command" used by the "Valetude RE" template: [rand256_valetudo_re.json](https://github.com/PiotrMachowski/lovelace-xiaomi-vacuum-map-card/blob/609e25ae4478d143d6d84590e250c4c2b169b9ec/src/model/generators/platform_templates/rand256_valetudo_re.json#L14)

@PiotrMachowski What I meant was that the API is different in the original "Valetudo". "Valetudo RE" uses a specific "custom_command", while the original doesn't. The functionality as such exists. So,...

:ok_hand: