Jean SIMARD
Jean SIMARD
Well, I just found out the following [link](http://futuretask.blogspot.com/2005/01/java-tip-6-dont-capitalize-first-two.html) that kind of explain my problem: the answer seems to be "there is some standard I was not aware of". Some framework...
The problem that this RFC solved can already be solved with semantic versioning, isn't it? Adding a new default-feature in a crate could be seen as a breaking change (for...
> you forgot to change the string in tests LOL Yes, I did... on purpose. If it ain't broken, don't fix it :stuck_out_tongue: That said, I was less confident to...
I'm gonna extract some part of this PR into smaller (or dumber PR). First one already opened is #3712.
OK, thanks for the answer. I'll start working on a cleaner version when I have some time :sweat_smile:
Thanks for the quick reply and the guidance. And indeed, your proposition makes a lot of sense and will be even better. I'll take a look at the code then.
# TL;DR; `Writer::flush` needs a `record` to figure out the headers... and I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense to send a `record` to `Writer::flush()`. # Long version...
No worry for the wild goose chase, it made me learn a bit about `csv` code so I don't feel like I lost my time :smile: I'll see what I'll...
What a nice use case indeed (even if I don't think I understood all the technicalities 😛). Thank you for pointing it out.
On Boost 1.55, the method `optional.value()` doesn't exist. On Boost 1.56, it does... but we haven't gone that far to entirely test on 1.56.