Severin Weingarten
Severin Weingarten
I second that! I would be happy to give $100 in advance for you to take another shot at this.
@celynwalters Is there a binary with your fix somewhere? I would love to give it a spin.
Sweet. Works perfectly for me! Thank you!
Using x1*x2 automatically includes x1, x2 and the interaction between the two. What is the correct way to include the interaction without including the individual terms?
I gave a more complicated example above, but assume that I know that the data-generating process does not include the main effect. Would you say that I am still forbidden...
Point taken. Frankly, I thought this example would be a slam-dunk, but it isn't. Allow me to go back to my use case of including an interaction which contains a...
Just stumbled across this bug. Any chance to merge this pull request?