Hua

> Please clarify: this BSIP proposes a change in how the price feed scripts work, not a change how the core code makes use of the price feed. Correct? >...

> Please add a "Discussion" section so shareholders can follow your reasoning instead of believing in the outcome. > > > The current consensus is that witnesses are still feed...

> Please add a "Discussion" section so shareholders can follow your reasoning instead of believing in the outcome. In also see, there are links to talk about

> Can a more descriptive title be given? You only make one proposed price feed script change, so only one 'loophole' is potentially addressed. I only said the reform, and...

> Most of these are in Chinese. It would be helpful for the english-speaking community if you could add a comprehensive version of the discussion that has taken place. There...

> Decouple BitAssets from Bitshares BSIPS Repository > [bitshares/committee-tools#11](https://github.com/bitshares/committee-tools/issues/11) I have to admit that you have diverted people's attention very well.

> 2. Discussing proposals is good practice, because discussion usually helps all parties to better understand the issue at hand, and it often leads to a better proposal as well....

> Technically it's better to implement the moving average or median price in core, like what's done in Steem (Steem witnesses do use a somewhat subjective `bias` parameter to adjust...

> > You may have misunderstood, I have not complained to anyone. > > Sorry, my comments were not addressed to you but to @ning-xiao . I should have made...

> > > Can a more descriptive title be given? You only make one proposed price feed script change, so only one 'loophole' is potentially addressed. > > > >...