David Remer
David Remer
That would be a cool feature. If its okay, I would label it in some `3.x` milestone?
It used to be `display:none`. Turns out, a lot of spam bots started to ignore fields with `display:none`, rendering this mechanism basically useless.
Moved this to future release :)
Imo to be discussed in 3.0, imo: disabling this central feature is like disabling the plugin. As we currently discuss and evaluate also other filters, there might be a reason...
Hi @slaFFik, thanks for this issue. Currently we are planning a general rewrite of Antispam Bee to have it more flexible. For me, one goal of this rewrite would be...
If we move on with this feature, we should take into consideration that single site settings should be able to overwrite network site settings. E.g. if you use Multisite for...
Hi @vasikgreif, this would be a good approach. Currently, I do not know, if we could support such a filter after our re-factoring, this is why I hesitate to say,...
Reading the discussion. Maybe my milestone was too early. I would like to see some changes in the interface. Generally, I would like to go more with the WP style,...
I think we should move on with the wp classes instead of inventing the wheel over again.
My current thoughts. As Gutenberg proceeds, we see a new UX approaching on the horizon, which most likely will not stop with the editor but will rethink the whole admin...