Walt
Walt
We were able to use lipo to combine x86_64 and arm64 architectures into a single .so and this satisfied Pyinstaller's requirements for fat binary. No further action required. Thanks!
It's worth mentioning as well that deployments of >=1.30 all update themselves fine without tar_hash mismatch errors. It's getting around the bad 1.29 that seems impossible.
We also tried removing 1.28 from targets.json since the first patch error originates with that version, but then we get a "targets was signed by 0/1 keys" error with updates...
Sure @dennisvang: [targets.json](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17553968/targets.json)
@dennisvang any luck finding a solution to this?
Thanks @dennisvang > > [...] which we subsequently rebuilt and added again to the repo (still 1.29) [...] > > How exactly did you do that? Did you use the...
@dennisvang Yes, it's a completely unmodified tufup-example script repo_add_bundle.py. We ran it twice for 1.29 which at the time was the latest version. We never decrement the version or try...
We’d like to try the proposed solution disabling dynamic client registration. Looking over docs it’s definitely not straight forward as also mentioned above. Any guidance on how to approach this...
We stumbled upon https://github.com/cevheri/keycloak-custom-event-listener as a potential (and still somewhat hacky) workaround for this. Really we just need a way to get back the old ownCloud Desktop and ownCloud Mobile...