Wainer Moschetta
Wainer Moschetta
> @BbolroC, any chance to help us to understand the failures in the s390x CI? This PR deleted [tools/packaging/kernel/configs/fragments/s390/network.conf](https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/4861/commits/32960d340905b57cf08c16e1be866e1a2f8589bf#diff-3d519fef6459ab438b480a7d6a049ee2b25a252a9d1f1cdcd5d03dcbc9066af4) By mistake @ryansavino ?
> > @BbolroC, any chance to help us to understand the failures in the s390x CI? > > This PR deleted [tools/packaging/kernel/configs/fragments/s390/network.conf](https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/4861/commits/32960d340905b57cf08c16e1be866e1a2f8589bf#diff-3d519fef6459ab438b480a7d6a049ee2b25a252a9d1f1cdcd5d03dcbc9066af4) > > By mistake @ryansavino ? It seems...
@ryansavino I don't have more to say than what @fidencio and @dubek already said.
> > > > @BbolroC, any chance to help us to understand the failures in the s390x CI? > > > > > > > > > This PR deleted...
> Once this one lands, we will need to raise a backport for the 5.19 bump, the SEV work should **not** be backported though. hi @fidencio , I didn´t get...
@yoheiueda thanks for addressing all my comments. As I mentioned before somewhere I am not an expert on this area, but my review didn't find any obvious problem. While it...
Hi @jodh-intel ! I'm helping @bookinabox implementing this issue. Regarding "Consider removing all the Kata 1.x information", here are some stuffs I think we should remove: * In `show_package_versions()` it...
Hi @bookinabox , First of all, I found the way you solve the lack of "for" in github actions very creative. I never tried to generate and run an action...
@bookinabox I ran the action a couple of times and I didn't see the timeout happening again.