Roberto Quintanilla
Roberto Quintanilla
Treating "box" as "display" and "position" feels like an oversight to me. What about [MDO's property grouping](http://codeguide.co/#css-declaration-order)? : 1. Positioning 2. Box model 3. Typographic 4. Visual
@eldelentes @kurenn The `align-items` property is being discussed on a [W3C draft called "Box Alignment Module Level 3"](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-align-3/#align-items-property)... so it _looks like_ it's being considered in the Box model.
Breaking builds due to Xcode releases can be avoided by using https://github.com/xcpretty/xcode-install ... so maybe we should add this I reconsidering my (visceral) point of view
In case of API-only projects, have a URL with the build info - like Foresight and RTS do
Yes! I'll work it out
@shishirmk On my first go, I broke the original usage, as lots of tests depends on the object having the `association_ids` method, so let me know if you guys are...
@christophersansone I'd prefer to stay away from the `polymorphic` word in the DSL. "Polymorphic" only takes true meaning when dealing with an object-relational mapper (i.e. ActiveRecord), but means nothing for...
...I'd also change `record_type` for just `type` if I had it my way :)
...BTW @christophersansone I like your example of Actor, awards and spouse for the test suite :) I'll bring the concept of "mechanophilia" in the test examples 👿
@shishirmk got stuck on #74 ... I mean, Travis CI shows all green, but running the performance tests on my lap fails randomly.