Valerie Carey

As an update to this one I have an open case 2203020040005244. I am being told that there is no guarantee of not getting extra rows. This is ok but...

I want to add we saw back-to-back failures starting April 24 and also on April 25 when we ran this process, which had never failed before.

Yes that is correct. We append rows in the output and do run(mini_batch). We expect the same number of input and output rows if all goes well. But very recently...

Linux. FYI I also have an official support ticket open for this issue. Case 2204260040007488

This problem appears to be worsening. We have a greater proportion of dripped rows. We tried to work around with error_bad_lines=False which was OK for a while but now lines...

It looks like adding engine='python' to our read_csv can work as a workaround but this is a serious Azure issue. We are losing about 10% of our rows. The new...

I have found some information on feature absence for TreeShap in Christoph Molnar's book [here](https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/shap.html#shap). It appears that an absent feature just follows all possible tree paths, which would lead...

Same issue with the embedding layer (July 2024) There is a workaround for my model which is to explain the model below the layer where inputs are concatenated. So, first...