Victor Kobinski
Victor Kobinski
This issue was resolved at https://github.com/seanmonstar/httparse/pull/147
@lpil What should I do with the tests that use a single case pattern match? Change them?
> Probably, yes. Also, you'll want to add tests for this new warning. And in the issue I mentioned adding a code action to fix this warning. Do you think...
I am implementing the changes you both suggested!
@GearsDatapacks can you suggest any example of a single case simplification where the pattern is not a constructor?
I was able to implement the code action for the constructor case! I'm going to make the code action work for other cases too.
I'm going to work on this.
I'm going to work on this issue.
> I think that's a great idea, we could also try and be more specific with the error message, for example if one writes `a.b` and module `a` actually has...
This change needs to be made in this [file](https://github.com/gleam-lang/gleam/blob/5406c800454a608e61d447ccd5799f10ae0e8149/compiler-core/src/parse/error.rs#L198). I think we’ll need to change the structure of this function to handle just this case. Maybe this case can be...