Aleksey Chernov
Aleksey Chernov
I choose option 1 (set project license to clearly GPLv2 or later) and 2 (update project license to GPLv3 or later), i.e. the one with the most votes. Voting results:...
Thanks. I will add the voting results to the end of the original post.
@pazos I don't care about copycats scam, I just can't write software in violation of its license :)
> Then you're fine and you can keep GPLv2. Can I use AndroidX in GPLv2 only software?
@pazos Quite a pragmatic approach, maybe I'll have to do so if buggins don't respond.
Thanks. Now I am creating a list of authors to get the opinion of all the other authors. Also waiting @buggins for explanations & opinion.
AUTHORS draft added https://github.com/virxkane/coolreader/blob/einwis/crengine/Tools/getauthors/AUTHORS.draft
@avnik, @roshavagarga, @plotn, @band-a-prend, @zwim, @norbi24, @Isira-Seneviratne, @Jellby, @t3d, @erosennin, @dbedrenko, @radioxoma, @ErofeevK, @frankyifei, @arthurzam, @City-busz, @Carmina16, @Edward259, @MatoDroid, @slonm, @burunduk, @strn, @cybersphinx, @data-man, @jperon, @macnuts, @probonopd, @chrox, @cramoisi, @bbgordon,...
> Anyway any licence is applicable to it according to the program author will. So you agree with the choice of @buggins? I think he will answer soon, he answered...
A little more than a week ago we talked to @buggins by e-mail, but now it's quiet, but without his opinion all this makes no sense. Of course, I'll wait...