venkataanil

I have done changes to support this https://github.com/venkataanil/infrared/commit/5b8524ec34d097a0df3f5869195d1bc3092833bf Will push patches to gerrithub for review

Sure thanks. I have submitted the below patches for review for the same 1) virsh: support multi hypervisor https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-openstack/infrared/+/461570 2) tripleo-undercloud: multi hypervisor support https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-openstack/infrared/+/461574 3) vbmc: multi hypervisor support...

The last patch[1] couldn't get merged. I have rebased it [1]. Can some one please review it? [1] https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-openstack/infrared/+/461583 note: Also please review this dependency patch https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-openstack/infrared/+/475719

Thanks Yarboa. Can someone please review https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-openstack/infrared/+/461583 (the last dependent patch) before closing this issue?

Here we have two things 1. Identify number of clients (LARGE_SCALE_CLIENTS) according to TERMINATIONS 2. From results.csv file, use only 200 status requests for latency calculation We should reduce number...

Initially submitted this file in perfscale-managed-services repo with PR https://github.com/cloud-bulldozer/perfscale-managed-services/pull/110 . However I got suggestions to submit in e2e-benchmarking rather than perfscale-managed-services.

Last push was related to an optimization where we each into remote namespace pod ping all pods of current namespace. Earlier we exec into remote namespace pod for ping each...

Can someone work on this feature with priority as still JetSki is the only option to deploy a large cluster? We are using JetSki to deploy a smaller cluster and...